Big Ideas
Aine Seitz McCarthy
  • Blog
  • About

Who's to say what's good?

10/10/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
It's important to think critically about how international development happens, how it happened in the past and what any unintended consequences are. Historically, development can look a lot like colonialism. Development projects are often led by people from whiter and more developed countries who seem to have an idea about what is best for a community. It's can be pretty tough to know what is best for any community, even if your own.

This brings me to the idea of cultural relativism. It seems easy (particularly in very interdisciplinary conversations) to talk about development in such an abstract way that we loose sight of the actual goal. Cultural and moral relativism applied to development would imply that one cannot say what sort of things are good or bad for a community, that these things are not universal.

I disagree with this notion. I think there are some basic elements that are universally (globally) good. Some examples: health care, having enough to eat, shelter, education, access to water. There may be some things to add to this list, but I'm sticking to the basics. Regardless of your culture, country, tribe, race, or age, I think human access to these elements is the goal of development.

Don't get me wrong here- the implications of culture are huge- and cultural differences have not been taken into account in development nearly enough (probably because most of the big shots in development have been strictly economists).  However, I'm not throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I'm sticking to the idea that international development can achieve good outcomes.


2 Comments
That Guy
10/11/2010 01:00:40 pm

Not to be that guy, but what if being able to guarantee health care, having enough to eat, shelter, education, and access to water requires a particular set of institutions. Then, those undeniably good things become composite goods coupled with the system required to guarantee them. To some, that composite good is not as obviously desirable. Perhaps the citizens of Pompeii would not have been desirous of changing to our current lifestyle of 55 hour work weeks, even though their drinking water was not safe.

Reply
A. S. McCarthy
10/13/2010 12:33:34 pm

This is an excellent point. Understanding comprehensively what this 'composite good' is before implementing (or even starting) a project is imperative. When it comes down to it, I say the decision is up to the people of Pompeii.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Aine Seitz McCarthy

    International development, economics and some pretty ambitious ideas from a stubborn graduate student clinging to her sense of adventure.


    Categories

    All
    Agriculture
    Amusements
    Books
    Camp
    Demography
    Economics
    Education
    Family Planning
    Fieldwork
    Futball
    Gender
    Grad School
    International Development
    News
    Public Policy
    Research
    Travel

    RSS Feed

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner


Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.